Legal Opinion
Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. De Vore
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 15, 1914No. 3340PublishedCited by 34 opinions
Error from District Court, Seminole County; Tom D. McKeown, Judge. Action by Isaac De Vore against the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtRiddle, J.
The allegations of negligence, so far as important here, are:
“That on the morning herein complained of the agents, servants, and employees, as well as the defendant, negligently and carelessly failed to make an inspection of said engine, and negligently and carelessly permitted said engine to go out of the roundhouse without any water glass on the side next to the fireman or any shield surrounding the place where said water glass should have been; that, without consulting him, the said fireman went over to the steam shovel engineer and obtained a water glass, which he negligently attempted,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Philadelphia & Reading Railroad v. DerbySupreme Court of the United States · 1853
- Independent Cotton Oil Co. v. BeachamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HadleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- Furnish v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1890
- St. Louis S. F. Ry. Co. v. RichardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- P. Lorillard Co. v. ClaySupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
- Oklahoma Producing & Refining Corp. of America v. FreemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Schuler v. City of MobridgeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. HodgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Bucktrot v. PartridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.