Legal Opinion

St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Hodge

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 11, 1916No. 3950PublishedCited by 35 opinions

Error from, District Cou/rt, Marshall County; Summers Hardy, Judge. Action by Edgar E. Hodge, a minor, by his next friend, Mrs. D. J. Hodge, against the St. .Louis «fe San Francisco Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSharp, J.

On the 9th day of February, 1911, Edgar E. Hodge, a minor, by his next friend and mother, Mrs. ,E. J. Hodge, instituted in the district court of Marshall county against the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company an action to recover damages on account of an injury sustained by the said Edgar E. Hodge on account of the alleged negligence of defendant’s servants and employees in the operation of one of its trains. At the trial plaintiff recovered a verdict for $20,000, from which the present proceedings in error have been prosecuted.

Among other errors complained of, and the first that…

2Cases cited73 opinions

  1. Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Madisonville Traction Company v. Saint Bernard Mining CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Stone v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. In Re MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. Ex Parte WisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1906

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. City of Tulsa v. WellsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Aderhold v. BishopSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. AustinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  5. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API