Legal Opinion

P. Lorillard Co. v. Clay

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 16, 1920PublishedCited by 64 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Law and Equity Court of city of Richmond, in an action of trespass on the case. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant assigns error.

1Opinion of the CourtBurks, J.

*740Bryan Clay recovered a judgment against P. Lorillard Co. Inc., for $15,000.00, for the loss of an eye, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the company while he was in its employment as a servant. This judgment the company seeks to have reversed.

[1] Formerly a plaintiff in error stood in this court in the position of a demurrant to the evidence, but this has' been changed. Now, in stating a case in this court which has been tried by a jury, it must be stated as the jury may have viewed it, remembering always that the jury are the sole judges of the weight to be given to the…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Kimball & Fink v. Friend's Adm' rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1897
  3. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  4. Lunsford v. DietrichSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  5. Whalen v. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Gazette, Inc. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
  2. Rawle v. McIlhennySupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
  3. Federal Land Bank v. BirchfieldSupreme Court of Virginia · 1939
  4. Bowie v. SorrellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1953
  5. Noell v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API