Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United Farm Workers v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 21, 1995No. Docket Nos. B080261, B081628PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KLEIN, P. J.

Petitioners United Farm Workers of America, AFL-CIO (the UFW) and interveners Father Joseph Tobin (Father Tobin), Mytyl Glomboske (Glomboske) and Rudolph N. Rico (Rico) (collectively, interveners) seek review of a decision by respondent Agricultural Labor Relations Board (ALRB) finding the UFW had violated Labor Code section 1154, subdivision (d), by conducting an illegal secondary boycott and requiring the UFW to pay compensatory damages to persons injured thereby.

Petitioner California Table Grape Commission (Commission) also seeks review of the ALRB’s decision insofar as…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Commodore Home Systems, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Ass'n for Retarded Citizens v. Department of Developmental ServicesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Peralta Community College District v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Ferdig v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. VidalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union v. Los Angeles Export Terminal, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. Californians for Population Stabilization v. Hewlett-Packard Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  5. Bonner v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API