Legal Opinion
Californians for Population Stabilization v. Hewlett-Packard Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 25, 1997No. Docket Nos. H013638, H014028, H014384PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MIHARA, J.
Plaintiff Californians for Population Stabilization (CAPS) appeals from judgments in favor of defendants Tata Sons Limited and its division Tata Consultancy Services (collectively Tata) and Hewlett-Packard Company (H-P). Tata appeals from an order denying its motion for attorney’s fees. For the reasons stated below, we affirm both judgments and the post-judgment order.
Procedural History
On October 4, 1993, CAPS filed a complaint for a preliminary and permanent injunction under Business and Professions Code 2 section 17200. The first cause of action alleged Tata had committed…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- In Re Marriage of ArceneauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Saunders v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Cortez v. Purolator Air Filtration Products Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Smith v. Rae-Venter Law GroupCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Walker v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2002
- Application Group, Inc. v. Hunter Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Exxess Electronixx v. Heger Realty Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1998
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.