Legal Opinion

United States v. Vidal

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 10, 2007No. 04-50185PublishedCited by 154 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge PAEZ; Dissent by Judge CALLAHAN; Dissent by Judge KOZINSKI.

PAEZ, Circuit Judge:

Following Juan Jose Vidal’s plea of guilty to a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, the district court imposed an eight-level sentence enhancement, pursuant to United States Sentencing Guidelines (“Guidelines” or “U.S.S.G.”) § 2L1.2(b)(l)(C) (2002),1 based on Vidal’s 1994 conviction under California Vehicle Code section 10851(a), which criminalizes “theft and unlawful driving or taking of a vehicle.”

In this appeal, we consider whether a prior conviction for a violation of section 10851(a) qualifies as an…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by154 opinions

  1. Arteaga v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. United States v. Aguila-Montes De OcaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. GrajedaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. United States v. Becerril-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. McMurrayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011

149 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API