United States v. Vidal
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge PAEZ; Dissent by Judge CALLAHAN; Dissent by Judge KOZINSKI.
PAEZ, Circuit Judge:
Following Juan Jose Vidal’s plea of guilty to a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, the district court imposed an eight-level sentence enhancement, pursuant to United States Sentencing Guidelines (“Guidelines” or “U.S.S.G.”) § 2L1.2(b)(l)(C) (2002),1 based on Vidal’s 1994 conviction under California Vehicle Code section 10851(a), which criminalizes “theft and unlawful driving or taking of a vehicle.”
In this appeal, we consider whether a prior conviction for a violation of section 10851(a) qualifies as an…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by154 opinions
- Arteaga v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Aguila-Montes De OcaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. GrajedaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Becerril-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. McMurrayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
149 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.