Legal Opinion

Bonner v. County of San Diego

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 26, 2006No. D045238PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BENKE, Acting P. J.

INTRODUCTION

The County Employees Retirement Law of 1937 (the CERL) (Gov. Code, 1 § 31450) establishes retirement allowances for persons classified as “general members” (see § 31670 et seq.) and more generous retirement allowances for persons classified as “safety members” (see § 31662 et seq.). Although safety members receive more generous benefits, they must contribute to their county retirement systems at a higher rate than general members. (Compare § 31620 et seq. with § 31639 et seq.)

Section 31469.4 defines safety members to include “persons employed as probation…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Woods v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. People v. SkinnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. King v. Thierry S.California Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Ventura County Deputy Sheriffs' Ass'n v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Mutual Life Insurance v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. McAllister v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. Arnall v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. San Diego County Employees Retirement Ass'n v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. People v. ZambiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  5. City of Alhambra v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API