Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Vitek v. Bon Homme County Board of Commissioners

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 2002No. NonePublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SABERS, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Duane Vitek, Michael Neth, Sandy Neth, Steven Neth and Sharon Neth (Vitek) applied for a writ of mandamus to compel the Bon Homme County Board of Commissioners (County) to submit to a vote of the qualified electors of the county a referendum regarding a variance granted by County for the construction and operation of a hog confinement facility. The First Circuit Court denied a writ of mandamus and we reverse and remand.

FACTS

[¶ 2.] On April 26, 2001, the Bon Hom-me County Board of Adjustment (Board) granted a variance to Leo and Linda Ped-erson (Pederson), allowing them…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. AlmondSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Baker v. AtkinsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Willoughby v. GrimSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. South Dakota Trucking Ass'n v. South Dakota Department of TransportationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Taylor Properties, Inc. v. Union CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Krsnak v. South Dakota Department of Environment & Natural ResourcesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Kirschenman v. Hutchinson County Board of CommissionersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Vitek v. Bon Homme County Board of CommissionersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Bechen v. MOODY COUNTY BD. OF COM'RS.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Hay v. Board of Com'rs for Grant CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API