Legal Opinion

Baker v. Atkinson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 2001No. NonePublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

[¶ 1.] Frawley Ranches, Inc. (Frawley) appeals from a circuit court order denying intervention and a judgment granting a writ of mandamus. We affirm.

FACTS

[¶ 2.] In 1998, Frawley began the process of developing a planned unit development (PUD) in Eastern Lawrence County, South Dakota. At that time, the 1,000 acres required for this development were zoned A-l Agricultural under Lawrence County’s Zoning Ordinance. For that reason, Frawley took the appropriate steps to move this project forward.

*268[¶ 3.] On September 2, 1999, the Lawrence County Planning Commission (planning…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Legislature v. EuCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. AlmondSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Steiner v. County of MarshallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Sorrels v. Queen of Peace HospitalSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Williams v. Clark County District AttorneyNevada Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Argus Leader v. HagenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Black Hills Central Railroad v. City of Hill CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Brendtro v. NelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Schafer v. DEUEL COUNTY BD. OF COM'RS.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API