Legal Opinion

Taylor Properties, Inc. v. Union County

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 12, 1998No. NonePublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMUNDSON, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Taylor Properties, Inc. (Taylor) alleged that Union County (County) violated its due process rights and took its property without just compensation in allowing a referendum vote which denied Taylor a change in the zoning of its property. The trial court granted summary judgment to County and Taylor appeals. We affirm.

FACTS

[¶ 2.] Taylor purchased approximately 13.61 acres of land from Maynard Larson on March 18, 1994, for $125,000. Taylor’s purchase from Larson was made subject to the ability of Taylor to secure a change in zoning. At the time of purchase, the land in…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. City of Eastlake v. Forest City Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Groseth International, Inc. v. Tenneco, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Moss v. GuttormsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Hartpence v. Youth Forestry CampSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Pickering v. PickeringSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Meinders v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. LaibleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Schafer v. DEUEL COUNTY BD. OF COM'RS.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Vitek v. Bon Homme County Board of CommissionersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Becker v. PfeiferSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API