Legal Opinion
Krsnak v. South Dakota Department of Environment & Natural Resources
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided December 12, 2012No. 26367PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR, Justice.
[¶ 1.] The Krsnaks sought a writ of mandamus to stay or rescind the Department of Environment and Natural Resources’ (DENR) approval of the plans and specifications for the Brant Lake Sanitary District project. The Krsnaks claim DENR did not meet the requirements contained in statutes, administrative rules, and internal manuals. The trial court denied the writ of mandamus. The Krsnaks appeal. We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
[¶ 2.] The Brant Lake Sanitary District was organized under SDCL chapter 34A-5 to provide a wastewater system for 235 residents and businesses…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Boe v. FossSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
- Nelson v. South Dakota State Board of DentistrySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Sorrels v. Queen of Peace HospitalSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Baker v. AtkinsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Willoughby v. GrimSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Paul Nelson Farm v. South Dakota Department of RevenueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Puffy's, LLC v. Dep't of HealthSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025
- Tornow v. Sioux Falls Civil Service BoardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Hoffman v. Van WykSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Krsnak v. Brant Lake Sanitary Dist.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.