Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Vitek v. Bon Homme County Board of Commissioners

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 14, 2002No. NonePublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERTSON, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1.] Duane Vitek, Michael Neth, Sandy Neth, Steven Neth and Sharon Neth (collectively Vitek) appealed the decision of the Bon Homme County Board of Commissioners (County) in granting a variance for the construction of a 3300-head hog finishing facility. The circuit court dismissed for failure to timely and properly perfect the appeal. We reverse and remand.

FACTS AND PROCEDURE 1

[¶ 2.] On April 26, 2001, the Bon Hom-me County Board of Adjustment (Board) granted a variance to Leo and Linda Ped- ersen (Pedersen), allowing them to construct a hog confinement facility in…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Martinmaas v. EngelmannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Moss v. GuttormsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Estate of Billings v. Deadwood Congregation of Jehovah WitnessesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Steiner v. County of MarshallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Guthmiller v. Deloitte & Touche, LLPSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  2. AEG Processing Center No. 58, Inc. v. South Dakota Department of RevenueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Daily v. City of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Daktronics, Inc. v. LBW Tech Co., Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Marschke v. WratislawSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API