Legal Opinion

Hay v. Board of Com'rs for Grant County

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 2003No. NonePublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KONENKAMP, Justice.

[¶ 1.] A zoning and planning commission, acting as a board of adjustment, granted a permit for the expansion of a dairy operation. Aggrieved by the decision, two taxpayers appealed to the county commissioners. The commissioners declined to hear the appeal, ruling that they lacked jurisdiction to review a decision of the board of adjustment. The taxpayers then petitioned the circuit court for a writ of mandamus requiring the commissioners to act. In denying the writ, the court ruled that the planning and zoning commission was properly sitting as a board of adjustment, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Moss v. GuttormsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Willoughby v. GrimSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Esling v. KrambeckSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Vitek v. Bon Homme County Board of CommissionersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Maas v. Department of Commerce & RegulationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Goos RV Center v. Minnehaha County CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  2. In the Matter of Petition of Montana-Dakota Utilities Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Heinemeyer v. Heartland Consumers Power DistrictSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Hay v. Board of Com'rs for Grant CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Heinemeyer v. Heartland Consumers Power DistrictSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API