Legal Opinion
Shoei Kako Co. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 6, 1973No. Civ. 33051PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIMS, J.
By its petition for writ of mandate, the petitioner, a Japanese corporation, seeks, review of an order of the trial court which denied its-motion to quash the service of summons purportedly effected by mailing a copy of tiie summons and complaint to its head office in Japan. (See Code Civ. Proc., § 418.10.) An alternative writ was issued and after argument the matter was submitted on the petition, the exhibits filed therewith, and the memorandum of points and authorities in opposition to the petition, and the return filed by real party in interest.
Petitioner contends: (1) that…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. PinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Hauenstein v. LynhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Buckeye Boiler Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Brian Barlow v. George Ground, Officer 9129 L.O. Oberlies, Officer 1706 A. Tucker, Officer 9363 Ray Shay, Officer 3269Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Nuovo Pignone S P A v. Storman Asia MVCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Peter R. Ackermann, Dieter Schultze-Zeu, Dietger Feder, Detlef P. Eulitz and Karl-Heinz Lingner v. Ira LevineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- DeJames v. Magnificence Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Dill v. Berquist Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.