Legal Opinion

Piercing Pagoda, Inc. v. Hoffner

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 29, 1976No. 577PublishedCited by 100 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*504OPINION

JONES, Chief Justice.

This appeal follows the entry of a final decree in equity of the court en banc against the appellants, Paul J. Hoffner, Jr., and Kay Hoffner. The decree enforces a restrictive covenant not to compete, and requires an accounting from the appellants for amounts earned in violation of a provision in the parties’ franchise agreement which provides that the appellants purchase all their earring requirements from the appellee, Piercing Pagoda, Inc.

Piercing Pagoda, Inc., is a Pennsylvania corporation which engages in the selling of earrings and provides an ear piercing…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. United States v. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
  3. Morgan's Home Equipment Corp. v. MartucciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  4. Jacobson & Co. v. International Environment Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  5. Maintenance Specialties, Inc. v. GottusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by100 opinions

  1. Atlantic Richfield Co. v. RazumicSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Fraser v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
  3. George Arnott v. The American Oil Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
  4. Aiken Industries, Inc. v. Estate of WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Fraser v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API