Piercing Pagoda, Inc. v. Hoffner
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
*504OPINION
JONES, Chief Justice.
This appeal follows the entry of a final decree in equity of the court en banc against the appellants, Paul J. Hoffner, Jr., and Kay Hoffner. The decree enforces a restrictive covenant not to compete, and requires an accounting from the appellants for amounts earned in violation of a provision in the parties’ franchise agreement which provides that the appellants purchase all their earring requirements from the appellee, Piercing Pagoda, Inc.
Piercing Pagoda, Inc., is a Pennsylvania corporation which engages in the selling of earrings and provides an ear piercing…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- United States v. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
- Morgan's Home Equipment Corp. v. MartucciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Jacobson & Co. v. International Environment Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Maintenance Specialties, Inc. v. GottusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by100 opinions
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. RazumicSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Fraser v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- George Arnott v. The American Oil Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
- Aiken Industries, Inc. v. Estate of WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Fraser v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.