Legal Opinion

John Lucas & Co. v. Evans

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 26, 1935No. 31,877PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This was an action to enjoin defendant from engaging in the paint and varnish business in Topeka for a period of five years from January 22, 1932. Judgment was for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

The facts are substantially as follows: Plaintiff is a corporation engaged in the wholesale distribution of paints and varnishes. Defendant was the president of the Miller-Hoyes Paint and Glass Company. This company is engaged in the business of selling paints and varnishes in Topeka. In 1928 defendant was an employee of plaintiff. He borrowed the money…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
  2. Mills v. ClevelandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  3. Kent Oil Co. v. WaddillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  4. Tong v. McArthurSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. H & R BLOCK, INC. v. LovelaceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  2. Eastern Distributing Co., Inc. v. FlynnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
  3. Eastern Distributing Co., Inc. v. FlynnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
  4. H & R BLOCK, INC. v. LovelaceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  5. Partsmaster, Inc. v. JohnsonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API