John Lucas & Co. v. Evans
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Smith, J.:
This was an action to enjoin defendant from engaging in the paint and varnish business in Topeka for a period of five years from January 22, 1932. Judgment was for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.
The facts are substantially as follows: Plaintiff is a corporation engaged in the wholesale distribution of paints and varnishes. Defendant was the president of the Miller-Hoyes Paint and Glass Company. This company is engaged in the business of selling paints and varnishes in Topeka. In 1928 defendant was an employee of plaintiff. He borrowed the money…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
- Mills v. ClevelandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
- Kent Oil Co. v. WaddillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
- Tong v. McArthurSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
3Cited by5 opinions
- H & R BLOCK, INC. v. LovelaceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
- Eastern Distributing Co., Inc. v. FlynnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
- Eastern Distributing Co., Inc. v. FlynnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
- H & R BLOCK, INC. v. LovelaceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
- Partsmaster, Inc. v. JohnsonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1979