Legal Opinion

Heckard v. Park

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 24, 1948No. 36,945PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wedell, J.:

This was a suit for an accounting and for specific performance of a written contract. Plaintiff appeals from an order sustaining a general demurrer to her amended petition.

While there were three parties to the contract, the plaintiff, the defendant and her mother, the mother is not a party to the action. We shall continue to refer to the parties as plaintiff and defendant.

The original petition, in substance, alleged;

Plaintiff and defendant are residents of Sedgwick county; on October 3,1941, they entered into a written contract marked…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Wood v. . Duff-GordonNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Nelson v. SchippelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  3. Brooks v. MullSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  4. Skelly Oil Co. v. Cities Service Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  5. Mills v. ClevelandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. First Nat'l Bank of Olathe v. ClarkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  2. O'Brien v. Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  3. Schultz & Lindsay Construction Co. v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Bonanza, Inc. v. McLeanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  5. Foltz v. StruxnessSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API