Legal Opinion

Foltz v. Struxness

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 28, 1950No. 37,880PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wedell, J.:

This action was instituted to enjoin the defendant from practicing medicine and surgery by reason of alleged violation of a written contract. Plaintiff prevailed and defendant appeals.

Defendant was a young doctor from Chicago, 111. He was well qualified by educational training but his practice experience was limited to less than one year. He was seeking a location and contacted appellee, a physician and surgeon with a well established practice in the city of Hutchinson, through a Chicago placement agency. Appellee was sixty-nine years of age…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Granger v. CravenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  2. Edgecomb v. EdmonstonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  3. New England Tree Expert Co. v. RussellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  4. Foster v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  5. Freudenthal v. EspeySupreme Court of Colorado · 1909

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Equifax Services, Inc., D/B/A Equifax Commercial Specialists F/k/a White & White Inspection and Audit Service, Inc. v. Steven A. HitzCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  2. New Castle Orthopedic Associates v. BurnsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Perryton Wholesale, Inc., a Corporation v. Pioneer Distributing Company of Kansas, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
  4. Frazier v. GoudschaalSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  5. Willman v. BehelerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API