Foltz v. Struxness
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Wedell, J.:
This action was instituted to enjoin the defendant from practicing medicine and surgery by reason of alleged violation of a written contract. Plaintiff prevailed and defendant appeals.
Defendant was a young doctor from Chicago, 111. He was well qualified by educational training but his practice experience was limited to less than one year. He was seeking a location and contacted appellee, a physician and surgeon with a well established practice in the city of Hutchinson, through a Chicago placement agency. Appellee was sixty-nine years of age…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Granger v. CravenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Edgecomb v. EdmonstonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
- New England Tree Expert Co. v. RussellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Foster v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Freudenthal v. EspeySupreme Court of Colorado · 1909
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Equifax Services, Inc., D/B/A Equifax Commercial Specialists F/k/a White & White Inspection and Audit Service, Inc. v. Steven A. HitzCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- New Castle Orthopedic Associates v. BurnsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Perryton Wholesale, Inc., a Corporation v. Pioneer Distributing Company of Kansas, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
- Frazier v. GoudschaalSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
- Willman v. BehelerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.