Legal Opinion

Weber v. Tillman

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 8, 1996No. 73,202PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Lockett, j.:

Plaintiff employer and defendant employee, both dermatologists, entered into an employment contract which included a covenant not to compete should the employment cease for any reason. Employee appeals the trial court’s enforcement of the noncompetition covenant, claiming that the noncompetition covenant is unenforceable as violative of public policy and that the trial court erred in calculating the liquidated damages of the non-competition covenant. The appeal was transferred to this court pursuant to K.S.A. 20-3017.

Dr. Wallace M. Weber, a…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Canfield v. SpearIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Simon v. National Farmers Organization, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  3. Tucker v. Hugoton Energy Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  4. McKissick v. FryeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  5. Galindo v. City of CoffeyvilleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Marquis v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  2. Varney Business Services, Inc. v. PottroffSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  3. Murfreesboro Medical Clinic, P.A. v. UdomTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. PaulSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  5. St Clair Medical, PC v. BorgielMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API