Kooman v. De Jonge
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Ottawa; Cross, J. Assumpsit by Gerritt Kooman against Grietje De Jonge and John M-. De Jonge for money had and received. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.
The cause was heard by the court upon stipulated facts, and a judgment was rendered *294for the plaintiff. Later, defendants moved for a new trial, which was denied. No exceptions were taken to any ruling, nor were points of law presented as is permitted by Circuit Court Rule 26, sub. (a). It is assigned as error — the first of several assignments— that:
“The court erred in finding from the stipulated facts that the said defendants did undertake in manner and form as the said plaintiff- hath in his declaration in said cause complained against them.”
And it is assigned as error — the sixth…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mull v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Miller v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
- Weist v. MorlockMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Stafford v. CrawfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Harrison Granite Co. v. StephensMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rothstein v. WeeksMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Adler v. KatusMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Simon v. ZarevichMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Donohue v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
- Feniger v. American Railway Express Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.