Harrison Granite Co. v. Stephens
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Ottawa; Padgham, J. Assumpsit by the Harrison Granite Company against George A. Stephens and others for interest on deferred payments, and for extra work. A judgment for plaintiff is reviewed by defendants on writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.
This is an action of assumpsit to recover the interest due on certain deferred payments, and for certain extra work performed by plaintiff.
On the l?th of November, 1902, the parties entered into a written contract, whereby the plaintiff agreed to furnish and set complete, upon a foundation provided by itself, to be placed, according to cemetery rules and regulations, on defendants’ burial lot in Riverside Cemetery at Moline, Ill., a family mausoleum, for which defendants agreed to pay $22,000. The contract, with the plans, designs, and specifications, furnished to and approved by defendants, *52p…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Stees v. LeonardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kooman v. De JongeMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Callan v. PeckSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1914
- Ramsay & Gatlin Const. Co. v. Vincennes Bridge Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
- Leonard v. State Highway DepartmentMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967