Cardenas v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GOLDEN, Justice.
Appellant Thomas J. Cardenas appeals the denial of his motion to correct or vacate an illegal sentence under Wyo.R.CrimP. 35(a). We affirm.
Cardenas presents these issues for our review:
I. This Court committed error in a prior appeal regarding the issues in this ease that are to (sic) fundamental to ignore in that the result now introduced into the product of preliminary hearings, preclu-sively mandates rights which counsel can demand to permit sufficiency of examination at the preliminary hearing; further this case establishes a due process rights at preliminary examination to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cardenas v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
- Ellett v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
3Cited by14 opinions
- Mead v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
- Lacey v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- Martinez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- McDaniel v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
- Sanchez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.