Legal Opinion

Cardenas v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1991No. 89-274PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MACY, Justice.

Appellant Thomas Cardenas appeals from his convictions for attempted first-degree sexual assault and aggravated assault and battery.

We affirm.

Appellant raises the following issues:

I.Whether due process, confrontation of witnesses, underlying values of the hearsay rule and fundamental fairness are violated by the admission at trial of prior testimony of the victim given at a preliminary hearing where:

1) Prior case law has restricted the motive and opportunity for cross-examination at a preliminary hearing.

2) Applicable law has limited the time and the opportunity for…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Mancusi v. StubbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Martinez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Bradley v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Grable v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Compton v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Lane v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Harris v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Trujillo v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Griswold v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1999

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API