Legal Opinion

Martinez v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 2002No. 01-7PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KITE, Justice.

[T1] Appellant Fredrich Martinez appeals from the district court's order denying his motion to correct an illegal sentence. Mr. Martinez claims his sentence is illegal because at the sentencing hearing the district court did not consider the possibility of probation. We affirm.

ISSUES

[T2] Mr. Martinez presents the following issue on appeal:

ISSUE I

Was [Mr. Martinez] granted consideration in the record of his application for probation, which was contained in the pre-sentence investigation report ordered by the district court?

The state rephrases the issue as follows:

Did the district…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sanchez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Griswold v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Mead v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Burk v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Beaulieu v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Manes v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Lacey v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  3. In the Interest of CT v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  4. McDaniel v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Cohee v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API