Pauly v. Pauly
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Haynes, C.
The complaint contains several causes of action, the first four being upon promissory notes alleged to have been executed by the San Diego Cable Railway Company to the California National Bank of San Diego, aggregating $57,330. Another cause of action is for attorneys’ fees and expenses in a certain action brought by the bank against the cable company in the United States circuit court; and the last cause of action is for the sum of $359,000, for moneys alleged to have been paid by the bank to various persons at the request of the cable company for its use and benefit and upon its…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Adams Mining Co. v. SenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- Leavenworth County Commissioners v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Santa Cruz Railroad v. SprecklesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Seeley v. San José Independent Mill & Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1881
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Board of Highway Commissioners v. City of BloomingtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
- Philpott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Curtin v. Salmon River Hydraulic Gold Mining & Ditch Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
- Newman v. Overland Pacific Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
- Phillips Petroleum Company v. Heber A. Peterson and Astrid N. D. Peterson, Phillips Petroleum Company v. John H. Haslem and Rebecca H. HaslemCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.