Adams Mining Co. v. Senter

Plaintiffs sued defendant for taking timber alleged to be their property. He claimed title as having purchased it from William Frne, the agent of the plaintiffs, and also of tbe South Pewabic Company, to apply in payment upon a bill of mining powder and fuse, which was due him from the latter company.

There is no dispute about the important facts in the case, which were in substance, so far as essential to the exceptions alleged in tbe cause, as follows:

Both companies were organized mining companies at *75Portage Lake, in the Upper Peninsula, mainly owned by the same parties in interest, and…