Santa Cruz Railroad v. Spreckles
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the county of Santa Cruz. The facts are stated in the opinions.
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
The important question in this case is, to what extent corporations organized and existing under the laws of this State may levy and collect assessments.
On the part of the respondent it is contended that no assessment can be levied upon any stock for which the subscription price has been fully paid.
*194The matter of assessments is regulated by our statute, and the question is therefore to be determined by its provisions. Section 331 of the Civil Code provides: “ The directors of any corporation formed or existing under the laws of the State, after one fourth of its capital stock has been…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sullivan v. Triunfo Gold & Silver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1870
- Seeley v. San José Independent Mill & Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by26 opinions
- Pauly v. PaulyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Sanderson v. Salmon River Canal Co., Ltd.Idaho Supreme Court · 1927
- Levering v. BimelIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- San Joaquin Land & Water Co. v. BeecherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Schnittger v. Old Home Consolidated Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.