Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. Marbury
Supreme Court of the United States
Appeal from the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Milleb
The appellant here, complainant below, was a corporation organized under the laws of West Virginia, engaged in the business of raising and selling petroleum. It became very-much embarrassed in the early part of 1867, and borrowed from the defendant the .sum of $2,000, for which.a note was given, secured by a deed of trust, conveying all the property, rights, and franchisés of the-corporation to William Thomas, to secure the páyment of said noté, with the usual power of sale in default of payment. The property was sold under, the deed of trust; was bought in by defendant’s agent for his…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Badger v. BadgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- Hoffman Steam Coal Co. v. Cumberland Coal & Iron Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1860
- Koehler v. Black River Falls Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1863
- Cumberland Coal & Iron Co. v. ShermanNew York Supreme Court · 1859
- Drury v. CrossSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by533 opinions
- Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. RadfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Galliher v. CadwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- In the Matter of Multiponics, Incorporated, Bankrupt. MacHinery Rental, Inc. And Carl Biehl v. William W. Herpel, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Geddes v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
528 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.