Legal Opinion

Phillips Petroleum Company v. Heber A. Peterson and Astrid N. D. Peterson, Phillips Petroleum Company v. John H. Haslem and Rebecca H. Haslem

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 21, 1954No. 4876, 4878PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Chief Judge.

This appeal involves the validity of a unitization provision in certain oil and gas leases. It reads as follows:

“12. Lessee shall have the right to unitize, pool, or combine all or any part of the above described lands with other lands in the same general area by entering into a cooperative or unit plan of development or operation approved by any governmental authority and, from time to time, with like approval, to modify, change or terminate any such plan or agreement and, in such event, the terms, conditions, and provisions of this lease shall be deemed modified to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Brewster v. Lanyon Zinc Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  2. Veal v. ThomasonTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Tanner v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Hudson v. NewellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
  5. Robertson v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Stirman v. Exxon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  2. Tiller v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  3. Texaco, Inc. v. LettermannCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  4. United States v. Orville H. DrummCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1964
  5. WildEarth Guardians v. National Park ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API