Sage v. Rudnick
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Swift county, Powers, J., denying a motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
Ejectment. The plaintiff claimed under record title from the United States. The defendant claimed title by adverse possession.
In support of his claim plaintiff introduced in evidence (1) a certified copy of an approved list of lands granted to the state by the act of July á, 1866,2 to aid in the construction of the Hastings & Dakota Railroad; (2) a trust deed from the railroad company to the plaintiff; (3) a deed from the state to the plaintiff, as assignee in trust for the railroad company. The defendant makes the point that, while it appears that such documents were introduced in evidence,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Baldwin v. TempleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Acker Post, No. 21 v. CarverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
- Long v. YoungSupreme Court of Georgia · 1859
- Roe v. Doe ex dem. LongSupreme Court of Georgia · 1859
- Larson v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
3Cited by14 opinions
- Tarver v. DeppenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- McClenahan v. StevensonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- Todd v. WeedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- George v. GistArizona Supreme Court · 1928
- Oahu Railway & Land Co. v. KailiHawaii Supreme Court · 1915
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.