Acker Post, No. 21 v. Carver
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the court of common pleas of Ramsey county, refusing a now trial after a trial before Brill, J., and a jury.
1Opinion of the CourtGilfillan, C. J.
In this case the statement of the case was agreed to by the stipulation of the respective parties, just as it was prepared by the appellant, and was signed bj' the judge of the court below, just as it was agreed to by the parties. The case mentions, as introduced or offered in evidence, various documents, but they were not set out in nor attached to it, nor in any way referred to nor mentioned in it as a part of it. Documents, such as are mentioned in the statement of the case, wore included in the return, and were claimed by the appellant to lie properly a part of the case. On respondents’…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Hill v. GillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Sage v. RudnickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Vassau v. CampbellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Clarke v. Cold Spring Opera House Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Gutmann v. KlimekSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.