Legal Opinion

George v. Gist

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1928No. Civil No. 2628PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcALISTER, J.

— I. M. George and E. M. Carrow, doing business as copartners under the name of Wallapai Mountain Cattle Company, filed a ■ complaint praying for a temporary restraining order commanding Aubrey Gist to desist from using the waters impounded in a tank or reservoir situated about twelve miles from the town of Kingman, county seat of Mohave county, in sections 29 and 30, township 21 north, range 14 west of the Gila and Salt River meridian, and known as “north tank.” Their prayer was denied, and they have brought the proceedings to this court for review.

It appears from the complaint that for more…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nelson v. BrodhackSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
  2. Bowen v. PrestonIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Riggs v. RileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Menzel v. Hinton.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  5. Inhabitants of School-District No. Four v. BensonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1850

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Neal v. HuntArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Pioneer Irrigation District v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Santos v. SimonArizona Supreme Court · 1943
  4. United Verde Copper Co. v. RalstonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
  5. Fritts v. EricsonArizona Supreme Court · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API