Hellman v. Anderson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIMS, J.
In this case, we hold that a judgment debtor’s interest in a partnership (meaning the right to share in the profits and surplus) may be foreclosed upon and sold, even though other partners do not consent to the sale, provided the foreclosure does not unduly interfere with the partnership business.
Judgment debtor John B. Anderson (Anderson) appeals from the trial court’s order authorizing the foreclosure and sale of Anderson’s interest in a California general partnership known as Rancho Murieta Investors (RMI). The foreclosure and sale was requested to enforce a money judgment…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- People v. WoodheadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Rodriguez v. BarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Passavanti v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Rojes v. Riverside General HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Taylor v. S & M Lamp Co.California Court of Appeal · 1961
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Madison Hills Ltd. Partnership II v. Madison Hills, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Tinseltown Video, Inc. v. Transportation InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Phillips, Spallas & Angstadt, LLP v. FotouhiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Baybank v. Catamount Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
- Regions Bank v. Alverine Associates, LLC and Rene Gregg, and Samuel Berger, and RBRE Loan Portfolio, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.