Legal Opinion
Tinseltown Video, Inc. v. Transportation Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 30, 1998No. D024037PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NARES, J.
— Plaintiffs Tinseltown Video, Inc. (doing business as Blockbuster Video), Gary Leonhard and Jeff D’Arcy (collectively, Tinseltown) appeal from various orders and a judgment on the pleadings entered in favor of defendant Transportation Insurance Company (Transportation). This appeal raises issues regarding the scope of personal injury liability coverage in á comprehensive general liability policy (policy) that Transportation issued to its insured Tinseltown, and whether Transportation owed a duty to defend Tinseltown against a third party lawsuit (the Chew action) brought…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Horace Mann Ins. Co. v. Barbara B.California Supreme Court · 1993
- Fibreboard Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- Bartlome v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1989
- Evans v. GalardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- McCormack Baron Management Services, Inc. v. American Guarantee & Liability Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1999
- United States v. Michael Gilbert, Karen Gilbert, Michael Gilbert Family Irrevocable Trust, Third Party Claimants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Mayer v. C.W. DriverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Stein-Brief Group, Inc. v. Home Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Sterling Builders, Inc. v. United National InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.