Legal Opinion
Phillips, Spallas & Angstadt, LLP v. Fotouhi
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 28, 2011No. A129047PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BRUINIERS, J.
A law firm obtained a $2.4 million judgment against one of its former partners, defendant Shahab E. Fotouhi, and, in an effort to collect the judgment, sought court orders (1) charging Fotouhi’s interest in his new law firm, Fotouhi, Epps, Hillger & Gilroy, LLP (the Partnership) (Code Civ. Proc., § 708.310; Corp. Code, § 16504, subd. (a)); (2) extending the order charging his partnership interest to a corporation it contends is a “mere continuation” of the Partnership formed “to frustrate attempts to collect on the judgment . . . ,” Fotouhi, Epps, Hillger & Gilroy, PC.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Ray v. Alad Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
- Lakin v. Watkins Associated IndustriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Horsford v. Board of Trustees of California State UniversityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- International Engine Parts, Inc. v. Feddersen & Co.California Supreme Court · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Powerhouse Motorsports Group, Inc. v. Yamaha Motor Corp., USACalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Cleveland v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- City of South San Francisco v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Daniell v. Riverside Partners I, L.P.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Li Guan v. Yongmei Hu, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.