Legal Opinion

Davy v. Ogier

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 6, 1948No. Civ. 13756PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.

Appeal by plaintiffs and cross-defendants from a judgment in favor of defendant and cross-plaintiff Estella E. Ogier, in an action brought to compel specific performance of an agreement to sell real property. One Huddleson, a tenant of the property under an unrecorded lease, was made a party defendant. Huddleson defaulted.

As to most of the facts there is no dispute. Defendant Ogier (hereafter referred to simply as defendant) owned a certain lot in Albany upon which was a store building. The upper floor was used as a residence. The lower floor, although built for store purposes, was leased…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sobelman v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Miller v. DyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Scheerer v. CuddyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Cockrill v. BoasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Smiddy v. GraftonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Katemis v. WesterlindCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. Ferguson v. CasparDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Nash v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. Weisberg v. AshcraftCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Turner v. Citizens National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API