Legal Opinion

Scheerer v. Cuddy

California Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 1890No. 13592PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.

John Bryson, being the owner of certain real estate, leased certain of the rooms in the building thereon to the appellant Los Angeles Lodge No. 42, F. & A. M., for the term of ten years, by a written lease. The lodge took and held actual possession of these rooms, but the lease was not recorded. Subsequently, and while the lodge was in possession, Bryson sold and conveyed the property to the plaintiff, and his deed was duly recorded. Whether the plaintiff had actual notice of possession of the premises by the said appellant, or not, is one of the controverted questions in the case; but it is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lestrade v. BarthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Hunter v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Pell v. McElroyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Moss v. AtkinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Follette v. Pacific Light & Power Corp.California Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Whitney v. ShermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Evans v. FaughtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Berge v. FredericksNevada Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Beattie v. CrewdsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API