People v. T. Wah Hing
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County. Malcolm C. Glenn, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
NICOL, P. J., pro tem.
Defendant was charged by an information filed in the superior court of Sacramento County with a violation of section 17 of the State Medical Practice Act, approved June 2, 1913 (Stats. 1913, p. 722). The information alleges that: “The said T. Wah Hing on the - day of August 1919, at the County of Sacramento in the said State of California and before the filing of this information did then and there willfully and unlawfully practice, attempt to practice and advertise and hold himself out as practicing a system or mode of treating the sick and afflicted in the State of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Abeel v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Ex parte LiddellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- People v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- People v. Boo Doo HongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- People v. PlathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- People v. OsakiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- People v. QuarezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- People v. RamseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- People v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- People v. GoscinskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.