Legal Opinion

People v. Goscinsky

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 25, 1921No. Crim. No. 946PublishedCited by 18 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.

This is an appeal from the judgment and from an order denying a motion for a new trial in a criminal prosecution wherein the defendant and appellant was charged with the offense of practicing a system and mode of treating the sick and afflicted without having at the time of so doing a valid, unrevoked certificate from the board of medical examiners of the state of California.

[1] The information charged the defendant by the name of A. G. Goscinsky, and upon arraignment the defendant stated his name to be A. C. Goscinsky, and thereafter the proceedings were conducted in that name; but during…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. Boo Doo HongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. People v. T. Wah HingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. SimonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. People v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  3. People v. OsakiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  4. People v. PierceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. People v. KendallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API