Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Ross

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 16, 1922No. Crim. No. 914PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.

Defendant, who had previously been convicted of a felony, was charged by information filed in the superior court of Tulare County with carrying a pistol concealed upon his person, in violation of section 3 of the act of 1917, which reads: “Every person who candes in any city, city and county, town or municipal corporation of this state any pistol, revolver or other firearm concealed upon his person, without having a license to carry such firearm as hereinafter provided in section six of this act, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and if he has been convicted previously of any felony, or of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. KramerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. People v. Woon Tuck WoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. People v. MayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. People v. Boo Doo HongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. People v. WademanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. HockSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
  2. People v. SimonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  3. People v. QuarezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Brown v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
  5. People v. SantosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API