People v. Plath
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, and John H. Riordan, Deputy Attorney-General, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
The defendant was charged by indictment presented July 25, 1912, with violating each and all of the numerous provisions of section 337a of the Penal Code. He interposed a demurrer on the grounds, substantially: 1. That the indictment does not conform, to the provisions of sections 950, 951, and 952 of the Penal Code; and, 2. That more than one offense is improperly charged therein. The demurrer was treated in the lower court as sufficiently presenting the objections stated, and in view of the action of the trial court should so be regarded here. The trial court sustained the demurrer, and the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. FrankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- People v. GossetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- People v. HarroldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- People v. JaillesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- People v. GustiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- People v. JermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- People v. DegnenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- People v. BarthelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Bealmear v. Southern Cal. Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.