Legal Opinion

People v. Osaki

California Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1930No. Docket No. Crim. 3270PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEAWELL, J.—

The defendants were jointly convicted upon five separate counts of an indictment containing six counts filed in the Superior Court of the county of Sutter, charging them with crime of conspiring to violate the Alien Land Act of the state. (Stats. 1921, p. lxxxiii; Stats. 1923, p. 1020; Stats. 1927, pp. 880, 881.)

The indictment charged that K. Yoshioka, a native of the" Hawaiian Islands, but admittedly of Japanese lineage, and K. Osaki, an alleged alien not eligible to citizenship under the laws of the United States, conspired together with the object and to the end that said…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Terrace v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Mobile, Jackson & Kansas City Railroad v. TurnipseedSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. Yee Hem v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Dunlop v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Morrison v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Sei Fujii v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. People v. AgnewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. People v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
  5. People v. FitzgeraldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API