People v. Jordan
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Allen & Weyl, Bennett, Turnbull & Thompson, and Delphin M. Delmas, for Appellant. U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, Robert M. Clarke, Deputy Attorney-General, and Ray E. Nimmo, for Respondent.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
An appeal was taken by the defendant to the district court of appeal of the second appellate district. The learned justices of that court could not agree with reference to the constitutionality of the law for violation of which defendant was found guilty, and accordingly the appeal has been duly transferred to this court. We have adopted the opinion prepared by Mr. Justice Victor E. Shaw of the district court of appeal in which Mr. Presiding Justice Conrey concurred. It is as follows:
“Defendant was charged with the commission of a misdemeanor in that, without having a valid, unrevoked…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dent v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Watson v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Collins v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Abeel v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Hellman v. ShoultersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Walker v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Boone v. KingsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Heron v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Powers Farms, Inc. v. Consolidated Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- In Re WeisbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.