Legal Opinion

State v. Ivey

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 23, 1949PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinbobne, J.

While the record on this appeal presents serious questions arising in the course of the trial in the Superior Court, a fatal •defect as to the first count appears upon the face of the record proper. No crime is there charged against defendant. Hence in that respect the •court has not acquired jurisdiction of defendant, and, in such case the judgment must be arrested. And even though there be no motion for the arrest of judgment, this Court will act ex mero motu, that is, of its own motion, where lack of jurisdiction is apparent on the face of the record. This was the procedure followed in S.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. . MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  2. Hopkins v. . BarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. Henderson County v. . SmythSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  4. McCune v. Rhodes-Rhyne Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. State v. . KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Town of Fuquay Springs v. RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. State v. JerniganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. State v. KleimanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. State v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  5. State v. EverettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API