Legal Opinion
State v. Kleiman
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided December 15, 1954No. 649PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
The only evidence before the court and jury was that offered by the State. The sole inquiry, as to nonsuit, is whether this uncontradicted evidence, and every reasonable inference to be drawn therefrom, considered in the light most favorable to the State, is sufficient for submission to the jury. S. v. Ritter, 239 N.C. 89, 79 S.E. 2d 164, and cases cited.
"While conceding the evidence shows an act of illicit sexual intercourse on 21 March, 1954, defendants contend it does not show that they did unlawfully, “lewdly and lasciviously associate, bed and cohabit together,” as charged in the bill of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. . McDuffieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- State v. . GuestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
- State v. LambeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- State v. . RinehartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- State v. . DavenportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Nevitt F. Ensminger v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
- Ensminger v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1977
- State v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970