Legal Opinion

State v. . King

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 14, 1942PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinborne, J.

The only exception, assigned by defendant for error on this appeal, is to the “findings of fact and judgment of the Superior Court.” The exception is not tenable.

“Appeals in criminal cases are controlled by the statutes on the subject.” S . v. Rooks, 207 N. C., 275, 176 S. E., 752.

While the statutes, under which the police court of the city of Asheville was created and now exists, with jurisdiction over criminal offenses therein defined, provide that “any person convicted in said court shall have the right to appeal to the Superior Court, and upon such appeal the trial in the Superior Court…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. EverittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  2. State v. Lytle.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. State v. . TrippSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. State v. HardinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  5. Henderson County v. . SmythSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  2. Hopkins v. . BarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Bailey v. McPhersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API