Legal Opinion

Town of Fuquay Springs v. Rowland

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 15, 1954No. 462PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

Defendant Rowland fails to assign as error tbe order overruling bis demurrer or to bring tbe exception forward and discuss tbe same in bis brief. Even so, in tbe light of our conclusion herein, this is immaterial.

A judge of a court of this State is not subject to civil action for errors committed in tbe discharge of bis official duties. Consequently no cause of action is stated against defendant Rowland, and as to him tbe action is dismissed ex mero motu.

“When . . . tbe complaint fails to state a cause of action, that is a defect upon tbe face of tbe record proper, of which tbe Supreme Court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hopkins v. . BarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. Aiken v. SanderfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Dare County v. MaterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. State v. IveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Edmisten v. TuckerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Redevelopment Commission of Greensboro v. HaginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Skinner v. Empresa Transformadora De Productos AgropecuariosSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Parrish v. BrantleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. May v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API