Legal Opinion

Hopkins v. . Barnhardt

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 24, 1943PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, J.

The only exception and assignment of error by the defendant is to the refusal of his Honor to enter judgment as of nonsuit upon the ground that plaintiff had not offered sufficient evidence to establish the ceiling price of the defendant on the date of sale of said sugar.

We think a more serious question confronts us on this record, to wit, one of jurisdiction. The court, in accordance with the long established practice, raises the question ex mero motu. “When there is a defect of jurisdiction, or the complaint fails to state a cause of action, that is a defect upon the face of the record…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Mondou v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Katzenstein v. Raleigh & Gaston RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  4. Henderson County v. . SmythSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. Shepard v. . LeonardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. MowreyIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Aiken v. SanderfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Town of Fuquay Springs v. RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. In re N.R.M.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  5. Bowman v. Comfort Chair CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API