Legal Opinion
Foland v. Jackson County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided May 23, 1990No. 89-105 and 89-111; CA A63989PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
GRABER, P. J. pro tempore
Petitioners seek review of LUBA’s order, which remands Jackson County’s land use decisions allowing respondent Provost Development Company (respondent) to site a destination resort on land currently designated and zoned for exclusive farm use.1 The county’s decisions included amendments to its acknowledged comprehensive plan and zoning map. Petitioners contend that LUBA erred by not requiring the county to demonstrate that the amendments comply with Goal 8, as well as with applicable statutes and county legislation, and by holding that the decisions could be based on…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Meyer v. LordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Jackson Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- Roth v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- Ludwick v. Yamhill CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- League of Women Voters v. Metropolitan Service DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
3Cited by1 opinion
- Foland v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1991