Legal Opinion
Meyer v. Lord
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided November 6, 1978No. LCDC 77-001, CA 10346PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, J.
Intervenors seek judicial review of an order of the Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) which vacated a zone change by Jackson County and remanded the matter to the Board of County Commissioners (Board) for reconsideration consistent with the LCDC opinion. The petition for review before LCDC challenged a zone change for a 70-acre parcel in a 250-acre farm owned by intervenors. The prior zoning was Exclusive Farm Use (EFU), which permitted outright the building or residential structures only in conjunction with farm use. The new zoning would be Farm Residential (F-5), which…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Warren v. MARION COUNTYOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Hillman v. Northern Wasco County PUDOregon Supreme Court · 1958
- SEALE v. McKennonOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Horner's Market, Inc. v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- Rutherford v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Board of Trustees of the Employees' Retirement System v. Mayor of Baltimore CityCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Wasco County CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Repass v. Workers' Compensation DivisionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2002
- Atlantis I Condominium Ass'n v. BrysonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
- State v. BroomSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.